I reviewed books as part of my "job" at The Handy, Uncapped Pen. Near the end of its seven-year run, I had multiple publicists and presses offering me every title by disabled and neurodivergent authors they worked with. I love reading... but I'm a lousy reviewer.
Reasons why I suck at reviewing books:
1. I cared too much about an author's feelings. Reviews are for readers, not authors, but I spent too much time concerned with discouraging or upsetting people. It definitely hindered the quality of my remarks, regardless of how much I still tried for honesty. The more popular the writer, the less I felt the need to hold back.
2. I don't have the skill. A proper review isn't like writing a blog post or an essay. An amazing reviewer will bring nuance to the subject. They will be able to compare a book to other titles and give examples of books that do something better.
3. Rigorous notes and annotations sapped my energy. It took me weeks to write a book review. I have limited spoons, and the urge to leave no facet unexplored in a text drained me. Most of the things I wrote down didn't even make it into the reviews! When I used to review Christmas movies on this blog, I would just watch them and give my thoughts... making it easier. Critiquing romance novels and poetry collections is also fun/less demanding for me.
Oddly, I never felt the need to appease a publisher or publicist who sought me out. Maybe it's because there are more published books in a year than I will ever read. I also wasn't afraid of retaliatory reviews at the time, but I'm concerned the possibility would affect my process now that I have a published poetry collection.
But I often think about reviewing poetry and other random bits (nothing too rigorous) on this blog. I kind of miss sitting with a text and telling people about it. But I don't want my failings to carry over if I try again.
Would you like to see me try reviews (again)? Do you miss the Christmas movie reviews in December? Let me know!